Skylar Paige Un Official Fan Site Tribute

Skylar Paige : This Is An Un Official Fan Site Tribute
Skylar Paige Skylar, Skyler
Porn Queen Actress Superstar

Movie Title Year Distributor Notes Rev Formats Anal Gang Bang 2001 Hollywood Video 1 O Big Clits Big Lips 3 2002 Channel 69 DRO Big Clits Big Lips 6 2003 Channel 69 Facial DRO Bushy Beavers 3 2003 Totally Tasteless Facial DO Coondog's Captive Chronicles 2 2001 B & D Pleasures NonSex Damn You're Hairy 5 2018 Rodnievision DO Dirty and Kinky Mature Women 34 2001 Channel 69 Facial 1 DRO Dirty And Kinky Mature Women 36 2002 Channel 69 DPP DRO Emerald Straps It On 3 2001 Totally Tasteless LezOnly DRO Follow the Yellow Old Stream 3 2006 Filmco Releasing Pee DO Follow the Yellow Old Stream 4 2006 Filmco Releasing DO Footin' on the Fritz 2001 Fems Inc Girls Next Door 8 2000 Annäka Anal Facial 1 Granny's Hairy Pussy 2007 Filmco Releasing DO Hairy Holes 2002 Gentlemen's Video Anal Facial DRO Hairy Honies 14 2001 Channel 69 Facial DRO Hairy Hookers 5 2009 Totally Tasteless DO Hard To Swallow 12 2001 X-traordinary BJOnly Facial 1 Horny Hairy Girls 3 2001 Odyssey Facial 1 DRO Horny Hairy Girls 4 2001 Odyssey BJOnly Facial 1 DRO Horny Hairy Girls 7 2002 Odyssey BJOnly Facial 1 DRO I Swallow 18 2001 Odyssey Facial Swallow 1 Kinky Housewives 2005 Filmco Releasing DRO Lesbian Mature Women 5 2000 Channel 69 LezOnly DRO Lessons In Cum 1 2002 Jet Multimedia Anal Facial Swallow DO Mature and Horny 2005 Niche Films DO Mature Hairy Gang 2004 Filmco Releasing Facial DRO Mature Kink 10 2001 X-traordinary Facial 1 DO Mature Nymphos 2005 Freaky Flix DO MILTF Gone Anal 1 2004 Filmco Releasing DRO Mondo Extreme 31: Me Myself and I 2001 Shooting Star Video MastOnly DO
Mondo Extreme 36: Geyser Gash 2001 Shooting Star Video DRO Muff Madness 3 2006 Filmco Releasing DRO Muffmania 8 2002 Totally Tasteless Facial 1 DO My Friends Slutty Mom 2008 No Limits Productions DO My Hairy Pussy 5 2005 Filmco Releasing DRO Natural Freaks 2002 Caballero Home Video Facial Swallow DO Oh My Gush 12 2002 Odyssey Oh My Gush 7 2000 Odyssey Facial Squirt 1 DO Oh My Gush 8 2001 Odyssey DO Oh My Gush 9 2001 Odyssey Facial 1 DO Old Cocksuckers 5 2009 Totally Tasteless DO Older And Anal 9 2002 Filmco Releasing 1 DO Older and Hairy 3 2006 Filmco Releasing DRO Pee Woman Unchained 2000 Filmco Releasing Pee 1 DO Peeing Contest 3 2000 Filmco Releasing 1 DRO Peeing Party 2000 Filmco Releasing Pee 1 O Pissing Beauties 4 2006 Filmco Releasing Pee DRO Pissing Cousins 2000 Filmco Releasing LezOnly Pee DO Pretty Anal Ladies 12 2000 Annäka Anal Facial Pee Pussy Shooters 4 2006 Totally Tasteless DO Real Deal 9 2001 Filmco Releasing Facial DO Rubee Tuesday's Double Penetration Association 1 2001 Shooting Star Video Anal DP Squirt O Screw My Wife Please 13 (And Do Her Doggy Style) 2000 Wildlife Facial 1 DRO She Swallows 9 2002 Filmco Releasing DRO Squirting Yellow 4 2005 Filmco Releasing LezOnly Pee DO Teenage Confessions 2 2002 Odyssey Tinkling Tinkerbabes 1 2005 Niche Films Totally Natural 2 2006 Totally Tasteless Facial

Emotion classification, the means by which one may distinguish or contrast one emotion from another, is a contested issue in emotion research and in affective science. Researchers have approached the classification of emotions from one of two fundamental viewpoints: that emotions are discrete and fundamentally different constructs that emotions can be characterized on a dimensional basis in groupings Contents 1 Emotions as discrete categories 1.1 Basicality debate 1.2 Semantically distinct emotions 2 Dimensional models of emotion 2.1 Circumplex model 2.2 Vector model 2.3 Positive activation – negative activation (PANA) model 2.4 Plutchik's model 2.5 PAD emotional state model 3 Criticisms 3.1 Cultural considerations 4 Lists of emotions 4.1 Basic emotions 4.2 Contrasting basic emotions 4.3 HUMAINE's proposal for EARL 4.4 Parrott's emotions by groups 4.5 Plutchik's wheel of emotions 4.6 Six emotion axes 4.7 The Hourglass of Emotions 4.8 The Book of Human Emotions 4.9 Mapping facial expressions 4.10 Emotional equations 4.11 Atlas of Emotions 4.12 Emotion and Stress 5 See also 6 Bibliography 7 Notes and references Emotions as discrete categories In discrete emotion theory, all humans are thought to have an innate set of basic emotions that are cross-culturally recognizable. These basic emotions are described as "discrete" because they are believed to be distinguishable by an individual's facial expression and biological processes.[1] Theorists have conducted studies to determine which emotions are basic. A popular example is Paul Ekman and his colleagues' cross-cultural study of 1992, in which they concluded that the six basic emotions are anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. Ekman explains that there are particular characteristics attached to each of these emotions, allowing them to be expressed in varying degrees. Each emotion acts as a discrete category rather than an individual emotional state.[2] Basicality debate Humans' subjective experience is that emotions are clearly recognizable in ourselves and others. This apparent ease of recognition has led to the identification of a number of emotions that are said to be basic, and universal among all people. However, a debate among experts has questioned this understanding of what emotions are. There has been recent discussion of the progression on the different views of emotion over the years.[3] On "basic emotion" accounts, activation of an emotion, such as anger, sadness, or fear, is "triggered" by the brain's appraisal of a stimulus or event with respect to the perceiver's goals or survival. In particular, the function, expression, and meaning of different emotions are hypothesized to be biologically distinct from one another. A theme common to many basic emotions theories is that there should be functional signatures that distinguish different emotions: we should be able to tell what emotion a person is feeling by looking at his or her brain activity and/or physiology. Furthermore, knowledge of what the person is seeing or the larger context of the eliciting event should not be necessary to deduce what the person is feeling from observing the biological signatures.[2] On "constructionist" accounts, the emotion a person feels in response to a stimulus or event is "constructed" from more elemental biological and psychological ingredients. Two hypothesized ingredients are "core affect" (characterized by, e.g., hedonic valence and physiological arousal) and conceptual knowledge (such as the semantic meaning of the emotion labels themselves, e.g., the word "anger"). A theme common to many constructionist theories is that different emotions do not have specific locations in the nervous system or distinct physiological signatures, and that context is central to the emotion a person feels because of the accessibility of different concepts afforded by different contexts.[4] Semantically distinct emotions Eugene Bann proposed a theory that people transmit their understanding of emotions through the language they use that surrounds mentioned emotion keywords. He posits that the more distinct language is used to express a certain emotion, then the more distinct the perception (including proprioception) of that emotion is, and thus more basic. This allows us to select the dimensions best representing the entire spectrum of emotion. Coincidentally, it was found that Ekman's (1972) basic emotion set, arguably the most frequently used for classifying emotions, is the most semantically distinct.[5] Dimensional models of emotion For both theoretical and practical reasons researchers define emotions according to one or more dimensions. in his philosophical treatise, The Passions of the Soul, Descartes defines and investigates the six primary passions (wonder, love, hate, desire, joy, and sadness). Wilhelm Max Wundt, the father of modern psychology, proposed in 1897 that emotions can be described by three dimensions: "pleasurable versus unpleasurable", "arousing or subduing" and "strain or relaxation".[6] In 1954 Harold Schlosberg named three dimensions of emotion: "pleasantness–unpleasantness", "attention–rejection" and "level of activation".[7] Dimensional models of emotion attempt to conceptualize human emotions by defining where they lie in two or three dimensions. Most dimensional models incorporate valence and arousal or intensity dimensions. Dimensional models of emotion suggest that a common and interconnected neurophysiological system is responsible for all affective states.[8] These models contrast theories of basic emotion, which propose that different emotions arise from separate neural systems.[8] Several dimensional models of emotion have been developed, though there are just a few that remain as the dominant models currently accepted by most.[9] The two-dimensional models that are most prominent are the circumplex model, the vector model, and the Positive Activation – Negative Activation (PANA) model.[9] Circumplex model The circumplex model of emotion was developed by James Russell.[10] This model suggests that emotions are distributed in a two-dimensional circular space, containing arousal and valence dimensions. Arousal represents the vertical axis and valence represents the horizontal axis, while the center of the circle represents a neutral valence and a medium level of arousal.[9] In this model, emotional states can be represented at any level of valence and arousal, or at a neutral level of one or both of these factors. Circumplex models have been used most commonly to test stimuli of emotion words, emotional facial expressions, and affective states.[11] Russell and Lisa Feldman Barrett describe their modified circumplex model as representative of core affect, or the most elementary feelings that are not necessarily directed toward anything. Different prototypical emotional episodes, or clear emotions that are evoked or directed by specific objects, can be plotted on the circumplex, according to their levels of arousal and pleasure.[12] Trnka et al. (2016) pointed out "the reductionist nature of the two-dimensional paradigm in the psychological theory of emotions and challenge the circumplex model” and constructed a 3D hypercube-projection.[13] Vector model The vector model of emotion appeared in 1992.[14] This two-dimensional model consists of vectors that point in two directions, representing a "boomerang" shape. The model assumes that there is always an underlying arousal dimension, and that valence determines the direction in which a particular emotion lies. For example, a positive valence would shift the emotion up the top vector and a negative valence would shift the emotion down the bottom vector.[9] In this model, high arousal states are differentiated by their valence, whereas low arousal states are more neutral and are represented near the meeting point of the vectors. Vector models have been most widely used in the testing of word and picture stimuli.[11] Positive activation – negative activation (PANA) model The positive activation – negative activation (PANA) or "consensual" model of emotion, originally created by Watson and Tellegen in 1985,[15] suggests that positive affect and negative affect are two separate systems. Similar to the vector model, states of higher arousal tend to be defined by their valence, and states of lower arousal tend to be more neutral in terms of valence.[9] In the PANA model, the vertical axis represents low to high positive affect and the horizontal axis represents low to high negative affect. The dimensions of valence and arousal lay at a 45-degree rotation over these axes.[15] Plutchik's model Robert Plutchik offers a three-dimensional model that is a hybrid of both basic-complex categories and dimensional theories. It arranges emotions in concentric circles where inner circles are more basic and outer circles more complex. Notably, outer circles are also formed by blending the inner circle emotions. Plutchik's model, as Russell's, emanates from a circumplex representation, where emotional words were plotted based on similarity.[16] There are numerous emotions, which appear in several intensities and can be combined in various ways to form emotional "dyads".[17][18][19][20][21] PAD emotional state model The PAD emotional state model is a psychological model developed by Albert Mehrabian and James A. Russell to describe and measure emotional states. PAD uses three numerical dimensions to represent all emotions.[22][23] The PAD dimensions are Pleasure, Arousal and Dominance. The Pleasure-Displeasure Scale measures how pleasant an emotion may be. For instance both anger and fear are unpleasant emotions, and score high on the displeasure scale. However joy is a pleasant emotion.[22] The Arousal-Nonarousal Scale measures the intensity of the emotion. For instance while both anger and rage are unpleasant emotions, rage has a higher intensity or a higher arousal state. However boredom, which is also an unpleasant state, has a low arousal value.[22] The Dominance-Submissiveness Scale represents the controlling and dominant nature of the emotion. For instance while both fear and anger are unpleasant emotions, anger is a dominant emotion, while fear is a submissive emotion.[22] Criticisms Cultural considerations Ethnographic and cross-cultural studies of emotions have shown the variety of ways in which emotions differ with cultures. Because of these differences, many cross-cultural psychologists and anthropologists challenge the idea of universal classifications of emotions altogether. Cultural differences have been observed in the way in which emotions are valued, expressed, and regulated. The social norms for emotions, such as the frequency with or circumstances in which they are expressed, also vary drastically.[24][25] For example, the demonstration of anger is encouraged by Kaluli people, but condemned by Utku Inuit people.[26] The largest piece of evidence that disputes the universality of emotions is language. Differences within languages directly correlate to differences in emotion taxonomy. Languages differ in that they categorize emotions based on different components. Some may categorize by event types whereas others categorize by action readiness. Furthermore, emotion taxonomies vary due to the differing implications emotions have in different languages.[24] That being said, not all English words have equivalents in all other languages and vice versa, indicating that there are words for emotions present in some languages but not in others.[27] Emotions such as the schadenfreude in German and saudade in Portuguese are commonly expressed in emotions in their respective languages, but lack an English equivalent. Some languages do not differentiate between emotions that are considered to be the basic emotions in English. For instance, certain African languages have one word for both anger and sadness, and others for shame and fear. There is ethnographic evidence that even challenges the universality of the category "emotions" because certain cultures lack a specific word relating to the English word "emotions".[25] Lists of emotions Humans experience emotion, with evidence used that they influence action, thoughts and behavior. Emotions are categorized into various affects, which correspond to the current situation.[28] An affect is the range of feeling experienced.[29] Both positive and negative emotions are needed in our daily lives.[30] Many theories of emotion have been proposed,[31] with contrasting views.[32] Basic emotions William James in 1890 proposed four basic emotions: fear, grief, love, and rage, based on bodily involvement.[33] Paul Ekman identified six basic emotions: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise.[34] Wallace V. Friesen and Phoebe C. Ellsworth worked with him on the same basic structure.[35] The emotions can be linked to facial expressions. In the 1990s, Ekman proposed an expanded list of basic emotions, including a range of positive and negative emotions that are not all encoded in facial muscles.[36] The newly included emotions are: Amusement, Contempt, Contentment, Embarrassment, Excitement, Guilt, Pride in achievement, Relief, Satisfaction, Sensory pleasure, and Shame.[36] Richard and Bernice Lazarus in 1996 expanded the list to 15 emotions: aesthetic experience, anger, anxiety, compassion, depression, envy, fright, gratitude, guilt, happiness, hope, jealousy, love, pride, relief, sadness, and shame, in the book Passion and Reason.[37][38] Researchers at University of California, Berkeley identified 27 categories of emotion: admiration, adoration, aesthetic appreciation, amusement, anger, anxiety, awe, awkwardness, boredom, calmness, confusion, contempt, craving, disgust, empathic pain, entrancement, excitement, fear, horror, interest, joy, nostalgia, relief, romance, sadness, satisfaction, sexual desire and surprise.[39] This was based on 2185 short videos intended to elicit a certain emotion. These were then modeled onto a "map" of emotions

nude bikini pics clinton photos chelsea pictures desnuda fotos naked laura porn free porno fan and linda video site lisa kelly playboy topless lolo joan xxx official sex traci ferrari lords eva photo the nue tube pic videos sexy smith ana leah welch lovelace you remini club loren giacomo karen elizabeth carangi fake julia trinity ava kate fenech dana pozzi images gallery edwige moana victoria kristel joanna pornstar foto sylvia rachel pamela principal clips movies lauren shania valerie fabian collins nia rio del robin rhodes hart jane stevens measurements susan taylor jenny sanchez moore lane antonelli lancaume nancy roselyn emily hartley boobs brooke angie kim web demi bonet carrie allen grant hot esther deborah with braga jones fansite yates freeones
lee heather tina inger severance christina louise lopez gina wallpaper nacked ann film nackt fisher carey corinne shue ass vancamp clery model shannon elisabeth panties biografia angelina sofia erin monroe dazza charlene janet doris vanessa anna belinda reguera diane paula fucking scene peeples sonia shauna autopsy monica sharon patricia alicia plato bardot
melissa movie picture cynthia nicole maria star nina julie mary gemser naomi williams torrent nuda barbara twain anderson gia nudes fakes larue pussy actress upskirt san raquel jennifer tits mariah meg sandra big michelle roberts marie lumley tewes clip salma vergara jada cristal day shields cassidy sandrelli penthouse dickinson goldie nud angel brigitte drew fucked amanda shemale olivia website milano ellen ellison vidcaps hayek stone download carmen bessie swimsuit vera zeta locklear shirley anal gray cindy marilyn connie kayla sucking streep cock jensen john tiffani stockings hawn for weaver rue barrymore catherine bellucci rebecca bondage feet applegate jolie sigourney wilkinson nipples juliet revealing teresa magazine kennedy ashley what bio biography agutter wood her jordan hill com jessica pornos blowjob
lesbian nued grace hardcore regera palmer asia theresa leeuw heaton juhi alyssa pinkett rene actriz black vicky jamie ryan gillian massey short shirtless scenes maggie dreyfus lynne mpegs melua george thiessen jean june crawford alex natalie bullock playmate berry andrews maren kleevage quennessen pix hair shelley tiffany gunn galleries from russo dhue lebrock leigh fuck stefania tilton laurie russell vids bessie swimsuit vera zeta shirley locklear anal gray cindy marilyn connie kayla sucking streep cock jensen john tiffani stockings hawn for weaver rue catherine barrymore bellucci rebecca bondage feet applegate jolie george thiessen jean june crawford alex sigourney wilkinson nipples juliet revealing teresa magazine kennedy ashley what bio biography agutter jordan wood her hill com jessica pornos blowjob lesbian nued grace
hardcore regera palmer asia theresa leeuw heaton juhi alyssa pinkett rene actriz black vicky rutherford lohan winslet spungen shawnee swanson newton hannah leslie silverstone did frann wallpapers kidman louis kristy valeria lang fiorentino deanna rita hillary katie granny girls megan tori paris arquette amber sue escort chawla dorothy jessie anthony courtney shot sites kay meryl judy candice desnudo wallace gertz show teen savannah busty schneider glass thong spears young erika aniston stiles capshaw loni imagenes von myspace jena daryl girl hotmail nicola savoy
garr bonnie sexe play adriana donna angelique love actor mitchell unger sellecca adult hairstyles malone teri hayworth lynn harry kara rodriguez films welles peliculas kaprisky uschi blakely halle lindsay miranda jami jamie ryan gillian massey short scenes shirtless maggie dreyfus lynne mpegs melua natalie bullock playmate berry andrews maren kleevage quennessen pix hair shelley tiffany gunn